![]() ![]() ![]() Languages which achieve memory safety through garbage collection are not ideal choices for systems programming because their runtimes can lead to unpredictable performance and unnecessary overhead. Such workloads need the speed and predictable performance that C, C++, and Rust provide. We, however, are talking about the need for a safe systems programming language (i.e., a language that can build systems other software runs on, like OS kernels). ![]() We encourage anyone who is currently using C or C++ to consider whether one of these languages would be appropriate to use instead. NET languages like C# or F# and other languages like Swift, Go, and Python. Now we’ll peek at why we think that Rust represents the best alternative to C and C++ currently available.įirst, there are plenty of fantastic memory safe languages already available and widely used inside and outside of Microsoft, including. ![]() In this series, we have explored the need for proactive measures to eliminate a class of vulnerabilities and walked through some examples of memory safety issues we’ve found in Microsoft code that could have been avoided with a different language. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |